1-1banner
 
medpundit
 

 
Commentary on medical news by a practicing physician.
 

 
Google
  • Epocrates MedSearch Drug Lookup




  • MASTER BLOGS





    "When many cures are offered for a disease, it means the disease is not curable" -Anton Chekhov




    ''Once you tell people there's a cure for something, the more likely they are to pressure doctors to prescribe it.''
    -Robert Ehrlich, drug advertising executive.




    "Opinions are like sphincters, everyone has one." - Chris Rangel



    email: medpundit-at-ameritech.net

    or if that doesn't work try:

    medpundit-at-en.com



    Medpundit RSS


    Quirky Museums and Fun Stuff


    Who is medpundit?


    Tech Central Station Columns



    Book Reviews:
    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    Read the Review

    More Reviews

    Second Hand Book Reviews

    Review


    Medical Blogs

    rangelMD

    DB's Medical Rants

    Family Medicine Notes

    Grunt Doc

    richard[WINTERS]

    code:theWebSocket

    Psychscape

    Code Blog: Tales of a Nurse

    Feet First

    Tales of Hoffman

    The Eyes Have It

    medmusings

    SOAP Notes

    Obels

    Cut-to -Cure

    Black Triangle

    CodeBlueBlog

    Medlogs

    Kevin, M.D

    The Lingual Nerve

    Galen's Log

    EchoJournal

    Shrinkette

    Doctor Mental

    Blogborygmi

    JournalClub

    Finestkind Clinic and Fish Market

    The Examining Room of Dr. Charles

    Chronicles of a Medical Mad House

    .PARALLEL UNIVERSES.

    SoundPractice

    Medgadget
    Health Facts and Fears

    Health Policy Blogs

    The Health Care Blog

    HealthLawProf Blog

    Facts & Fears

    Personal Favorites

    The Glittering Eye

    Day by Day

    BioEdge

    The Business Word Inc.

    Point of Law

    In the Pipeline

    Cronaca

    Tim Blair

    Jane Galt

    The Truth Laid Bear

    Jim Miller

    No Watermelons Allowed

    Winds of Change

    Science Blog

    A Chequer-Board of Night and Days

    Arts & Letters Daily

    Tech Central Station

    Blogcritics

    Overlawyered.com

    Quackwatch

    Junkscience

    The Skeptic's Dictionary



    Recommended Reading

    The Doctor Stories by William Carlos Williams


    Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82 by Elizabeth Fenn


    Intoxicated by My Illness by Anatole Broyard


    Raising the Dead by Richard Selzer


    Autobiography of a Face by Lucy Grealy


    The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks


    The Sea and Poison by Shusaku Endo


    A Midwife's Tale by Laurel Thatcher Ulrich




    MEDICAL LINKS

    familydoctor.org

    American Academy of Pediatrics

    General Health Info

    Travel Advice from the CDC

    NIH Medical Library Info

     



    button

    Wednesday, December 15, 2004

    Dire Warnings: A new study says that taking calcium channel blockers with diuretics may increase your risk of dying:

    The new study indicates calcium channel blockers may indeed double the risk of dying of heart disease, especially when paired with diuretics, which reduce the amount of fluid in the blood. Although the study involved women, the authors believe the findings also apply to men.

    The new study in today's Journal of the American Medical Association involved almost 20,000 women being treated for high blood pressure in the long-term study of postmenopausal women called the Women's Health Initiative.

    It found that women who took diuretics plus calcium blockers had twice the risk of death as women who took diuretics with beta blockers, drugs that reduce the heart's workload. Women took a calcium blocker alone had a 55 percent higher risk of death than women who took a diuretic alone.

    The authors cautioned that the study's design, in which patients are followed for a number of years, doesn't yield the same 'gold-standard' evidence that comes from randomly dividing patients into treatment and control groups.


    And yet, despite that caution, the author's still can't restrain themselves from making comments like this:

    'This raises serious questions about using calcium channel blockers in patients with uncomplicated high blood pressure,' says lead author Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller of Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York. 'If I were on that combination, I would want to know, 'Why this one?'

    These are the same authors and the same study that gave us hormone hysteria a few years ago.

    Their abstract only presents their results in terms of hazard ratios, which can be very distorting. But the morning paper had the details, and they aren't nearly as impressive:

    Still, the number of heart-related deaths was relatively small: 31 out of 1,223 women taking the calcium channel blocker combination versus 18 out of 1,380 on the beta blocker combination and 17 out of 1,413 on the ACE inhibitor duo.

    That's 2.5% vs. 1.3% vs. 1.2%. We already know that beta blockers and ACE inhibitors can play important roles in treating heart disease. We would expect that patients on those drugs would do better from a cardiac standpoint. What's more, some people with hypertension are also placed on calcium channel blockers to treat arrhythmias, which could also increase their cardiac mortality. Although the abstract says the authors controlled for "multiple covariates" it doesn't tell us what those covariates were. I'll have to wait until my complementary issue of JAMA arrives in the mail to find out. (Unable to access online.)

     

    posted by Sydney on 12/15/2004 07:28:00 AM 0 comments

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

    Main Page

    Ads

    Home   |   Archives

    Copyright 2006